id
stringlengths 16
16
| text
stringlengths 6
5k
| labels
class label 2
classes | uid
int64 0
128k
|
|---|---|---|---|
c69eaf40d861ce5b | "
Split this article
The trouble with this article is that it does not understand that both Zionism and anti-Zionism became museum pieces on May 17, 1948. People who call themselves Zionists or anti-Zionists are delusional, they think they are living in a past more than 60 years ago.
Everything called ""anti-Zionism"" that refers to events after the date on which the state of Israel was established should be transferred into a new article anti-Israelism. " | 0non
| 126,900 |
b037c2fed49c3d0b | That's probably a good plan, Reikasama. If you have questions in the future, especially regarding what to do when you have disagreements with other editors, please ask at any time (and I'm sure Elen will be willing to help, tooshe's very kind that way). | 0non
| 126,901 |
f36374af17471824 | THE FUKKING RETARDO RACISTO KANUCK | 1tox
| 126,902 |
95c8fece81c31206 | "
This is where I - as one of the erroneiously accused "" meatpuppets "" respond ;
Just out of interest, who do you think this nark is and why is he so motivated to go about doing what he is doing? I put this record up in the open for you and them to see because I have no and have had no connection with you nor any of the journal pages and, frankly, I take offence at being called a meat or sockpuppet of yours when I am not. I am sure that you are just or even more upset as being accused of a connection with me when you have none.
Unfortunately though, that is the depth of 's lies and the shallowness of 's integrity.
Where he has no grounds he invents them and he is, oh, so clever at playing WikiTricks with all these technical terms and methods.
I am starting to feel like a Jew in Nazi Germany being hunted down, connected to individuals which I have no connection with and their so-called crimes and accused of crimes which are not mine.
And what of ? He just seems to get off on throwing around his weight whilst avoiding entering into the actually factual discussion.
For the record - and let them love every minute of their persecution syndrome, let them avidly copy and paste and make little weblinks to this as they are so good at Wikitricks - I am a vegan of 20 years or more standing and, arguably, MacDonald of Clanranald. I became involved in editing the vegan article before you returned to it recently. I am entirely responsible for kicking this whole thing off because I refused to let get away with his ridiculous domination of the article and I put in the same category for his anorexic stuff.
From my point of view, my objections are largely literary. The article became too bloated and required editing down. It is merely meant to be a definition of what vegan is. I don't see any point in actually engaging in those that oppose veganism. I don't even support vegan's trying to counter counter-vegan propaganda on the Wiki. It is best to keep it short and simple and give a few links so that folks that are interested can go find out more.
I approached reasonably and got the same sort of response as you did, see ; . When started to engage in his revisions without consultation, I tried to engage him in reasonable discussion, see ; . But he just ignores it.
Fine. I showed respect, they showed themselves for what they are.
I find it weird in a way that individuals can become so obsessed by something that they obviously do not love but instead want to demean or destroy - and that means you now - and are willing to invest so much time and energy into it.
I could understand it if was a paid employee of the meat industry - he says he has professional scientific interest in animal husbandry. That would just make him a paid publicist. But if he is doing this and attacking you in his own free time, I pity him deeply.
""What were you doing all this evening on your computer, darling?"" His wee wifie asks him.
""Oh, I spent hours trying to stomp on vegans on the internet, made a really good complaint against one and tried to mess up their article with references to anorexics who think they are vegetarians ""
""That's nice.""
" | 0non
| 126,903 |
4d4c145630606ba9 | Wake in Fright
I have no doubt you mean well, but Aussie posters should be used for Aussie films. Can't find the original Aussie poster, but the one you keep adding back is the original US one. | 0non
| 126,904 |
d2740f4e1c30d9be | Hello
Hello fro thw cheesegrater2003 | 0non
| 126,905 |
2aea165917955f04 | If you continue to change it, I will report you for vandalism. | 0non
| 126,906 |
eaaf36cecdc00898 | I agree with Ali. The [[Encyclopaedia of Islam] states that N. Sims.Williams' researches partly support the old claims of Enoki, that the Bactrians indeed used Bactrian. However, they also reveal that Bactrian was not the native tongue of the Hephthalites - though still pointing to the theoriy that their native tongue was an East Iranian language, infiltrated with many Turkic and/or Mongolian words. | 0non
| 126,907 |
bd077012f5d1b796 | Just updated. SRS won 4, and not 5. | 0non
| 126,908 |
b4ad12566fee5739 | "::I agree with JackofOz. Leaving out the apostrophe s is wrong. It's like saying ""I hand"" or ""me hand"" instead of ""my hand"". ""Tchaikovsky's"" is correct, in my opinion.
" | 0non
| 126,909 |
57d51c40db63f84b | where you can get all the help needed for you to create a fine article. Promotional and badly written articles can't be on Wikipedia. Thank you and I hope you will contribute to Wikipedia according to the rules. | 0non
| 126,910 |
d1929ec4c959a9b8 | Regarding edits made during March 11 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Silver | 0non
| 126,911 |
72c4d973497e2611 | Wikibreak coming up
'''Please note that I will be away for much of October, so you will probably not get a speedy reply | 0non
| 126,912 |
c5830b88d60523c0 | "
Romiz Uddan
Romuz Uddin
I have added a ""{{prod}}"" template to the article Romuz Uddin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. " | 0non
| 126,913 |
2239d45daa374289 | EDIT-woops, that was me. | 0non
| 126,914 |
278cf248daecfa6b | Well at least you acknowlege your breach of policy. My comments are observations, not personal attacks. Aside from that e-mail of course, which falls outside of Wikipedia's jurisdiction. I sincerely feel you're not up to being an admin on wikipedia. I don't even feel you'd make a good editor on articles. From the limited experience I've had with how you do your little job here, I feel you're unintelligent and that you're impulsive. Those are my opinions. My observations. If you take them to heart, that's you. I take it you're an actual human being and not a bot; as such I presume you understand that there are definitions of 'unfair' outside of the Wikipedia rulebook. Other admins did comment on your frivilous use of the block, she could have too. Instead she chose to ignore your 'breach of policy' and comment on me. Anyway, this is about you and not her, so that's all I'll say of that. Cheers. | 0non
| 126,915 |
42849301895535e6 | 5 june 07
The Leader of the Frat Pack
does anyone disagree with this order User:Harry Weasley15:32 5 june 07
1) ben stiller
2) owen wilson
3) will ferrell
4) vince vaughn
5) luke wilson
6) jack black
7) steve carell | 0non
| 126,916 |
12209ec590af124c | by calling people for their behavior, | 0non
| 126,917 |
1d237690307f388f | I agree with Kishorekumar. Many forces have declared unilateral ceasefires when winning a war, such as the US-led coalition in the First Gulf War of 1991. The US had completely dislodged the Iraqis from Kuwait, routed their divisions, and could have easily marched on Baghdad, but decided to withdraw to pre-war boundaries after accomplishing their limited strategic goals. Cheers, | 0non
| 126,918 |
841076b262740155 | "
1857 seems about right. Bandini was the sucessful claimant in 1855 (Land Case 213 SD), and died in 1859. 1841 was when Stearns married Arcadia Bandini. Boyd's ""History of San Bernardino and Riverside counties"" mentions Rancho Jurupa and Williams and Colonel Johnson. Hoover's ""Historic spots in California"" has Robidoux buying 1/2 interest from Wilson in 1848 and 1/2 interest from Williams in 1849. " | 0non
| 126,919 |
128063c1b26e8718 | Why the need to add Cornish as a nationality?
Whatever your views, Cornwall is a county of England and therefore the UK. It is not a nation. Please stop reverting from British. | 0non
| 126,920 |
283dbf71077f07bf | "
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section." | 0non
| 126,921 |
37270fb9899f6065 | "Oh, and don't you dare ever come to my talk page and state ""UN General Consensus"" to me as a source for any fact. I couldn't care less what an organisation the Majority of members which to see my homeland ravaged for the benefit of numerous rhetorical lies including the idea that Affirmative action isn't discrimination. The British courts have stated that Affirmative Action is unconstitutional becuase it disriminates, that's all I need until you provide a serious source, not ""UN General Consensus"" about an organisation which has countries as members who treat Woman as second class. " | 0non
| 126,922 |
f2c9de11cbbaf999 | Oh, and btw, stuff your threats and warnings where the sun don't shine. OK? | 0non
| 126,923 |
04813a80ab8a146e | User:Shakeelaamir
I've blocked User:Shakeelaamir. You can always report such users at WP:AIV. | talk | 0non
| 126,924 |
481a832389537122 | "
""Most important, consequential, or influential"", is a matter of opinion. Declaring Waters the ""principal songwriter"" is still original research, and needs a source. " | 0non
| 126,925 |
5e11287899d20f58 | "I've completed the nomination for you, but I would say that I would like it if you came to the AfD page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ātmaprajñānanda Saraswati and gave a little more explanation of your nomination other than ""advertising"". The reason is that many feel that this isn't enough to warrant deletion, as this can sometimes be easily fixed. It'd be better if you were to come in and explain how you feel that the person doesn't pass notability guidelines for one reason or another per WP:GNG, such as the author not receiving a lot of in-depth coverage in English or foreign language sources. (｡◕‿◕｡) " | 0non
| 126,926 |
84b06e991ec7a1d2 | Support This article is just a list of bullet points. All of the real information is at Indian Space Research Organization. To compare to a similar topic, United States space program just goes to NASA. | 0non
| 126,927 |
e294aec419551cd6 | wanna suck j.dealony's dick or schnitzelmanGreek's dick,you dick MY ACCOUNT IS Khan Schnitzel-Hellenic Penguins Armies from Mordor112233 BUT IT KEEPS BLACKLISTING IN CREATION. WHY?70.153.248.107 ? | 1tox
| 126,928 |
2b00cfaf987126a9 | Collaboration
Wikipedia requires that unless some information is so common and well known (e.g. the sky is blue by day) it needs to be sourced, otherwise it is a violation of original research or synthesis. The statement about Israel and South Africa collaborating on nuclear research because both found it difficult to elicit help from other nuclear capable countries is something that either needs a verifiable and reliable source or it cannot remain in the article. Thanks. | 0non
| 126,929 |
d82b64279620c5b2 | "::Again, self submitted, not academic, not peer-reviewed, not exactly a ""recognised publishing house"" either, http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk and no way to check the credentials of the authors one way or another. But ""parental alienation"" can sometimes be a dubious field, certainly isn't universally recognised by the academic or medical mainstream. Does not accord with WP:SOURCE.
" | 0non
| 126,930 |
8365a5bda5b15c5f | Now that it is properly licensed, I can put it on commons. I am not saying you made a mistake, just that a precision was needed. They are very strict about the licensing there ) | 0non
| 126,931 |
157a97cb0a17a566 | Again; please review WP:NPA, and in future confine your contributions on here to how to improve the article. If you have direct information that justifies removal of the tags on the article page, then please outline them here before trying to remove them again | 0non
| 126,932 |
4b5fcbeff5fbea9a | Simple quote
Don't you think this essentially Kantian (or maybe Hegelian) view expresses a sentiment that lies at the heart of the misgivings that many have about adopting an excessively pro-scientific stance?
Almost every scientist I have ever spoken to about the nature of science believes that scientists study the world 'out there' ; in other words, they study an objective world devoid of human emotions and meaning. They find it quite difficult at first to understand that what they are really studying is the phenomena - the mental representations of the world 'out there'. Once thus enlightened they can then perceive that their knowledge of the world 'out there', far from being objective, is intimately bound up with, and inseparable from, their hopes, fears, and other emotions. The world is one thing, and our knowledge of it is another ; we ought not to imagine that our understanding of the world is the world itself. James, Norwich
However, the The Times article which this comment comes from is a good example of extremely pro-science views, a view that sees nothing wrong with the impact science has had on our world. Peter morrell | 0non
| 126,933 |
b3bb9c78550af15d | Just a heads-up
Dude, you got to be wrong there. IMO Computer Science is more of a discipline. 121.6.236.4 | 0non
| 126,934 |
eeb8808f65951071 | hey dead set Fuck Head | 1tox
| 126,935 |
5b668f47dc9862d9 | I agree, could someone please put it on Wiki page and then protect it again? caffolote 19:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | 0non
| 126,936 |
b5fb4aa4b9e81a34 | deported more than 1,500,000 Polish citizens - Soviet documents prove less than 500 000. Plus POW, people who migrated themselves, drafted, prisoners - still less than 1,500,000 . | 0non
| 126,937 |
a4703293061307c6 | """The smaller pedestal desks with such a panel are sometimes called kneehole desks, and were usually placed against a wall.""
Is that logical?
Might ""with"" be a literal error for ""without""?" | 0non
| 126,938 |
44bb6ee6a9a9c783 | Lots to go yet, but sandboxing it . | 0non
| 126,939 |
ed56cdc2cd22db91 | This is your personal opinion that does not belong in an article. | 0non
| 126,940 |
8f7a396817c674a0 | Man this guy is hated by ever wiki. I can't imagine why lol. 76.123.133.181 | 0non
| 126,941 |
82d98f07fb7e1359 | Ahh, I see. apparently has special privileges and can repeatedly vandalize articles by posting ignorant lies, non-credible sources and original research. I'll bet he feels special. | 0non
| 126,942 |
e0fead60e4924d59 | If it matters that much change the damn spelling. | 1tox
| 126,943 |
688ad99659cdb1a7 | "David, I think the onus is on the user who adds someone (to a list of notable people) to explain why that someone is notable. So I'll ask: who the heck is J. Ashley Ebersole 2001? A google search shows a mock trial win and some things in the Student. That seems about as far from notable as you can get, much less notable than, say, Ilya Somin 1995, who doesn't have a mention on the page.
I would also disagree with the addition of Keats to the page. Keats apparently added himself; but at least his ""accomplishments"" (sic) have gotten him some newspaper articles.
If you have some information on Ebersole that I don't, why not write a brief article? - " | 0non
| 126,944 |
e3b9c9497cc65bf3 | Hello, I am new here. | 0non
| 126,945 |
d38ce9117da127db | "
Other sources
I am listing sources I have found here, some have information that can be useful in this article and some have information that can be used in the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 article. I have written out basic citations here that can easily be copied into either article if anyone would like to do some expansion work.
Montalto, Jim. ""Hearings and surveys move PREA forward"" The Corrections Connections Network News, June 16, 2006, accessed June 4, 2008.
Beyerlein, Tom. ""Prison rape survey stuns Ohio's prisons director"", Dayton Daily News, August 21, 2007, accessed June 4, 2008.
More stuff to come, I will just add it above.
" | 0non
| 126,946 |
c2cb45d2915f1ac6 | Arkham Origins
Hey. Just wanted you to know that I never got around to looking over the page, but I don't think it is in dire need anyways. Turns out having a break from school is equally busy as being in school. Anyways. One thing I think we should look at are the skins listed. Most of them were from sources before the game released, and a good amount of them have not appeared in the game, and don't seem to exist. I'm going to go through those and would like your help to confirm or deny the ones kept or removed (at least for the time being). - | 0non
| 126,947 |
519bbad14f19022b | fag that can't get laid | 1tox
| 126,948 |
16e4ff97f82f2df4 | Speaking as a Bolton Fan,i have heard The Term Lancashire Derby Many Times,it is used when Bolton Play Wigan,Blackburn,Bury,United,Blackpool amd so on,and so on.However Wigan is much,much,much more closer to Bolton than to Manchester.Bolton to wigan is 11 Miles,Wigan to Manchester is over 20 Miles. | 0non
| 126,949 |
d536fbf7e0b9ecd4 | Hi Sitush, I think you are mistaken with the last article. I have only added the reference to Bhagavad Gita, and the commentaries written by the saints which were properly referenced. You can look at my latest edit of the article . If that appears gibberish to you, then I can't help it anymore. Then I must say, the entire Bhagavd Gita commentaries written by them are gibberish as per your evaluation. If you can help me point out the problem referring to the latest edit of mine, then I can improve upon it. Kindly point it out. Thanks. | 0non
| 126,950 |
9520b7908b038b17 | Is there evidence of King's defense beyond the mother's word? However non-credible Breitbart may be in this instance we weigh their reputation against that of a self-proclaimed adulterous whore. Surely that goes to credibility. 169.57.0.200 | 0non
| 126,951 |
2656986105a3f926 | "
Remove - unless adjusted significantly to be unobtrusive... just for the record, for when it creeps back. (Talk)(Stuff) " | 0non
| 126,952 |
217cb1f82d58da83 | "
Good Article nomination has failed
The Good article nomination for has failed
Nice article, but on readings the T.D. Judah article nominated at the same time I feel this one has missed something: TDJ says that both locomotives were built for companies that couldn't pay for them, but this is not mentioned here. In both articles, a little bit more about what they were used for would be nice.
" | 0non
| 126,953 |
c6dbb778e12c31c5 | (UTC)
I am only 15 where am I supposed to pull the money from if I lose? 10:42, 22 July 2006 | 0non
| 126,954 |
d7b0b0baea946eea | "
AFD
Please don't remove the AFD tag until the process is complete, usually five days. talk " | 0non
| 126,955 |
37939da7d5344e37 | South Tibet/ Arunachal Pradesh / Arunachal Pradesh dispute / South Tibet dispute
As a participant to previous discussions at the South Tibet/ Arunachal Pradesh / Arunachal Pradesh dispute / South Tibet dispute talk page, you might be interested to participate to the following poll. Thanks, | 0non
| 126,956 |
4089547e5b6f446c | But (pace Str1977) I do think it's worth retaining a little more of that comment about the great diversity of early forms of Christianity (some of them really quite weird by modern standards). I think it's a historical fact that many modern Christians don't realize (and some of them perhaps try to suppress, by asserting that the early Church had a unified body of agreed doctrine). | 0non
| 126,957 |
dbb345ce5efffad8 | igger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nig | 1tox
| 126,958 |
2f52cddb7ac92a2e | "* The paragraph added in support of Brown is sourced from the same texasgopvote.com and that also was removed for that reason.
About this edit I'm not sure it's necessary to list ""Bitch"" along when the journalist also wrote for The Atlantic, Nerve, FHM, and other publications. Better to just say Texas Observer. While it does say she holds an MFA in Creative Nonfiction from the University of Arizona, I'm not sure why this is brought up in the article.
" | 0non
| 126,959 |
373507aa05916484 | . Thanks.
C3po345 18:06, 5 | 0non
| 126,960 |
c0e50f9f6b73d939 | Home ==
Hey Doc, i know where you live! i will come by and bring some friends to fix you something. Let's barbeque and relax!
== | 0non
| 126,961 |
d1aeb5ec2a39f895 | "
You're welcome! Glad to help you. talk & contribs" | 0non
| 126,962 |
d33002c00181547c | YOU CAN VOTE FOR legal distribution of MJ. | 0non
| 126,963 |
c785c27224d9df24 | "
This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption.
""This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. ""
yea,yea,yea i get it... u got all ur nerd ""skillz"" and can ""block"" me...
well i got something to say
SUCK IT BITCH
and get a hobby" | 1tox
| 126,964 |
0159b920dc044c8d | "
Vandalism is for e.g. this type of edit, somebody said that The Stig was leaving so I reverted it, basically I reverted it because there was no source to suggest that he was leaving, so I do know what vandalism is I just want to carry on editing Wiki, I love this place it's amazing please don't ""make me leave"", now that I've explained myself please please unblock me ( Thanks —123 " | 0non
| 126,965 |
38c822dc15fccc41 | Someone provided one, but it's been removed, having no license. Farmbrough 21:14 3 July 2006 (GMT).
Census data
Someone added updated info from 2002. I'm assuming that it's correct, but changing the wording to reflect that ost of the data is from 2000. Farmbrough 21:14 3 July 2006 (GMT). | 0non
| 126,966 |
ca494f0ab3086057 | I did it to Snopake too (and I think Ayelie once) Will | 0non
| 126,967 |
9ecef4a2f7b6c7d0 | My edits are not non-sense or a spew of vandalism and personal attacks! | 0non
| 126,968 |
eae197054c5de06d | You gotta love when they send a noted racist anti-Semite to do this kinda crap. | 1tox
| 126,969 |
23ba34d2cb4b863e | "
Is ""Sara Lee"" her real name, or was it chosen as a spoof of the pastry company? I couldn't find out on the internet... Someone add this info to the main entry if pertinent. " | 0non
| 126,970 |
3ee2006800207254 | "
Two FSes!
Your Featured sound candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured sound status, File:USMC stars stripes forever.ogg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another sound, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates. ''''''
Your Featured sound candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured sound status, File:Taps on bugle.ogg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another sound, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates. '''''' " | 0non
| 126,971 |
57793ca07b335ae2 | He said I removed his addition but that did never happen. | 0non
| 126,972 |
ddf816380a32c531 | I was very much rejected. Policy need wide acceptance. Also, any other time this idea has been suggested in other areas it has been rejected. A minority can try to change consensus, but if it does not succeed then they will likely not get their way. Chillum | 0non
| 126,973 |
7c60355750181f53 | "::This surprises me. (talk)
" | 0non
| 126,974 |
d9885617673a767b | I've asked admins to pitch in at AN. Maybe one of them will knock it out with AWB or something. In the meantime, I took 5 of the D's. Said ~ Did | 0non
| 126,975 |
fa5cda17fcdc2aac | "
Starlet
Starlet (film) is the only article with that title so should not need ""film"" in brackets. Am I missing something? Have I misunderstood Wikipedia policy? " | 0non
| 126,976 |
b156c67fec7e8dcf | "
None of the aboveand you really should be asking this at the Reference Desk; article talkpages are for discussing the article. → ₪ " | 0non
| 126,977 |
302019522cedbe0c | "
The following was deleted from a DISCUSSION again: ""Rumination, also known as Omar Amanat, is being creative indeed about many aspects of trying to promote himself and deny facts of a family nature about himself, including his religion, that he may consider to get in the way of his ability to promote his business interests. When he claims that ""There is no reliable, published source that states that he has two wives and this is slanderous if untrue"" he uses the phrase ""if untrue"" only because he knows he has had a wedding with Sabiya Amanat and a wedding with Helena Houdova while to-date not having had a divorce from either of these two wives in any jurisdiction where the wedding ceremonies took place or where they reside."" Such deletions prevent the ability for discussions to occur and have nothing to do with personal attacks in as much as I have followed this too. IF Wikipedia articles are meant to be an accurate representation of the subjects then discussions need to be allowed, for otherwise this will be just a soapbox for the likes of Rumination.
" | 0non
| 126,978 |
da315c4126ab4c86 | It seems rather confusing and contradictory for me to read that Naseerudin Shah is a descendant of an Afghan warlord named Jan Fishan Khan and his surname is Shah which is indicative of his Syed descent i.e. Arab and from the Prophet's (PBUH). Khan is an indication of Pashtun or Mughal affiliation and I have read in many sources that Idries Shah claimed to be a descendant of Bukhari Syeds as did Syed Kamal Shah the late Pakistani film star. Please can someone shed light on this. Moarrikh | 0non
| 126,979 |
6c75dd03b3efe945 | "
Talkback
| talk to me
WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
{| class=""navbox collapsible collapsed"" style=""width:100%; text-align: left; border: #039 2px; margin-top: 0.2em; background-color: #FFFFFF;""
|-
! style=""background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 2px #039 solid; text-align: center;"" |The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter
|-
| style=""border: 2px #039 solid;""|
{| class=""plainlinks""
| colspan=""2"" valign=""middle"" style=""width: 50%; border: 2px #039b solid; background-color: #FFFFFF; padding: 1em;"" |
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter Issue LXIII - February 28, 2010 Issue LXII | Issue LXIV
|-
| valign=""top"" style=""border: 2px #039 solid; padding: 1em; width: 48%; background-color:#FFFFFF;"" |
Project in Review
As of February 2010:
Changes to Featured and Good Content
Promoted Featured articles:
None
Promoted Featured lists:
List of TNA Women's Knockout Champions
Promoted Featured topics:
None
Reassessed Featured content:
None
Promoted Good articles:
Nick Nemeth {{small|[[Talk:Nick Nemeth/GA1|(review p | 0non
| 126,980 |
12642f6b770f58d6 | "
User:70.81.117.175
I'm glad to see that you've banned this user for a long time, but I can't help but feel an even longer block is in order. As you can see from their block log they've repeatedly been given long blocks (2 weeks, 3 weeks, 2 months, and now 3 months) and it hasn't done anything to stop this user. I've been following this user for probably 6 months now, and I've pretty much looked at every edit they have made. I have yet to find one single ""good"" edit that they have done. Every edit they do is about ""ethnic"" things, either inserting their strangely skewed demographics numbers, or en-masse inserting of ethnic categories to articles on people without providing a single source (I have a feeling they are basing their addition of these categories solely on the last name of the person). In every case Wikipedia is not better off by the edit this user has made.
In addition, it is my belief that " | 0non
| 126,981 |
43dd90d9e980aca3 | "
to do
add a short synopsis for each act as in ""Killers"". " | 0non
| 126,982 |
4ee165908deb5819 | Loanwords from Chinese
I have added some Chinese for the more simple and obvious borrowings. I would like to see a source that jurj (tangerine) is really a borrowing from the Chinese. The Chinese word that comes to mind would be 橘子/桔了, but it does not really look like a cognate for jurj. | 0non
| 126,983 |
794f6c0dbe1849b1 | Why are you reverting my edits?
If you have some sort of an objection, use the talk pages of relevant articles. Just don't try to play charade or hide-and-seek or whatever the fuck with me! | 1tox
| 126,984 |
149f202061ef2b7e | Also note that this guy ^^ had his name redacted from the discussion history to protect his privacy even though his full name appears in his signature (albeit in Japanese). Even if I had a complete lack of knowledge about the Japanese language, Google is able to automatically detect this... http://translate.google.com/#auto|en|%E3%82%AF%E3%83%AA%E3%82%B9%20%E2%80%A2%20%E3%83%95%E3%82%A3%E3%83%83%E3%83%81 99.231.241.146 | 0non
| 126,985 |
741b8041d2c31ebd | Is something like Managing_Urban_America going to be a problem? 16:52 Dec 20, 2002 (UTC) | 0non
| 126,986 |
6ff8b3a4710f29fe | An Editor posted a concern that I am too close to Sharmila fair enough. But I don't really update anything anymore. If people want to find out about her they will have to find other means. Wiki is to provide a base of verifiable data. So long as people don't arbitrarily remove information that's fine. There doesn't appear to be anyone else willing either to discuss POV concerns or to update the information. In the past when I have vandals have just removed everything. People can find out more by other means but there's a lot of rubbish posted on the Web and one false reference still on Wiki which I leave just to confirm the lazy still quote Wiki when they haven't done their homework. The only thing I'd keep for now are her trial dates. But that will soon end. The main people who would take an interest in this page would be corrupt officials from Manipur and those who profit from its lawlessness. And of course wiki editors who like to edit things. But it's only one source and the internet will fail if people revert to one source. | 0non
| 126,987 |
278ec28530557d1a | You're just a vandal
You are not helping Wikipedia with all your blatant vandalizations of Warner Bros. cartoons. Leave and never return, please. 72.37.171.100 | 1tox
| 126,988 |
ac43bdca5c14a913 | "
Off you go again. Accusing me of bad faith. Accusing me of this. Personalizing that. Can you not simply focus on editing? Do you need to personalize everything and make it about you? Can you stop attacking and defaming me personally. You also do not focus on the questions at hand. That need an answer. That is, editing only. I don't know what will stop you!? Instead you just wrote this..."" is that you harbor a great deal of animosity toward OHP,....."" No, I don't. Stop accusing. Stop personalizing, again and again. Just focus on editing please. " | 0non
| 126,989 |
e00670c8f402b5e0 | "
BBC did indeed release it's list of ""Top 100"" based on 30,000 respondents.
BBC's numerical ""rankings"" of the 100 apparently weren't disclosed until, after the ""poll"" was rather heavily flogged in a series of broadcasts, in which each of the ""Top 10"" were advocated by various celebrities/authorities/commentators, and during which time a vastly larger number of ""voters"" called in.
I seem to remember the final number on order of 130,000. Whether or how this affected final rankings, is apparently unknown. Obviously these people were if nothing else, in some degree, TV fans.
The Wikipedia article seems to fully accept the validity of the BBC ""poll"" (which was not at all focused on Scott). Further, the article implies (to me) that the poll revealed a decline, over time, in Scott's popularity with the British Public.
Seems like a reasonable thesis, but without comparable ""polling"" data from previous periods, this is not more than interesting speculation on the part of whatever author is cited.
For deep background, Wikipedia itself has a number of (non-featured) articles that are somewhat relevant with regard to the rather complex topic of polling, including sampling error margin of error, tracking poll, straw poll, and various other topics.
I'm certainly uninformed.
" | 0non
| 126,990 |
32388654093b3967 | ) Excellent answer, you show sound judgement as always. Answer the questions, add your acceptance, and make live at your convenience: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dalbury. ?!? | 0non
| 126,991 |
aa51d986956d58fe | (UTC)
Shorne, sorry to break it to you, but referring to the Holodomor and the famines in Russia in general as a holocaust does not diminish the holocaust against the Jews. Unless, of course, you wish to say that eliminating the social class of peasants is in some way trivial, and hence it would trivialize the killing of the Jews as an ethnic group by association.
Calling the holodomor and the related events a holocaust rather puts those events in the right perspective: there WAS both CALLOUS and deliberate killing of the undesired class during the holodomor that was NOT principally ANY different from the shoa. Have a look at Hannah Arendt's writings and you will see what I mean.
However, from your comments regarding the alleged 'bias' against left-wing pov's here, I assume that you are in fact somewhat of a Soviet apologist. Since I am myself a social-democrat, I can't say that there is any kind of bias against left-wing POV's here. Rather, there seems to be a fortunate tendency towards limiting both right-wing and left-wing extremism. Or, in other words, wikipedia seems to have adopted a cultural most befitting to an open society, and rather hostile towards totalitarian ideas.
How fortunate.
05:13, 17 September 2005 | 0non
| 126,992 |
91b9c22ec8bd0424 | I might say I don't necessarily agree with some of the points mentioned here about me ). Furthermore, every editor (or at least most) are evolving. So I hope I'll evolve past the above mentioned perceptions. | 0non
| 126,993 |
9324cedc0fcf5a85 | Here's a link to Lupin WP:LAVT | 0non
| 126,994 |
16513ddf4d3c970d | "
Sorry, there was a User who was vandalizing my page. Um, GPA is Grade Point Average. Do you want to move this discussion to my talk page? That way we don't clutter up Yunshui's. Smalls " | 0non
| 126,995 |
d8da5d177b7e112c | "
I agree with you, although I don't see a problem with keeping ""fact"" info that Iraq will play in this tournament and sooner or later the statistics-tables will be re-added to this page.
The statistics-tables
Confederations CupYearRoundGPWDLGSGA 1992 to 2005 Did not qualify 2009Qualified TotalBest: Qualified000000
Confederations Cup HistoryYearRoundScoreResult2009Round 1 – Round 1 – Round 1 –
Group A
TeamPldWDLGFGAGDPts00000000000000000000000000000000
Consensus on FIFA Confederations Cup
How about Wikipedia:Consensus?
If we get a consensus to keep the stats, I'll revert it back to the original one." | 0non
| 126,996 |
3698094ca07e1654 | "
Ask me why I didn't complete this survey. [[User talk:Spinningspark|Spark]]''' " | 0non
| 126,997 |
dc80098c6b319680 | "
A poor reference is better than no reference. Unless you can find a replacement that just as comprehensive, I would leave it. In any case, the one in question (I'm assuming you mean the only TM on the reference list: TM 11240-OD) is marked as open to public distribution; it would be available upon request to anyone who requested it under the Freedom of Information Act. ♠♣ " | 0non
| 126,998 |
b78f69fde27898ac | That refernce has been there for 6 months and now you choose to remove it completely. Because I am part of the bias I have no input? | 0non
| 126,999 |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.