idx
int64 0
3.7k
| table_id
stringclasses 48
values | column_num
int64 0
7
| column_name
stringclasses 94
values | column_dtype
stringclasses 3
values | jurisdiction
stringclasses 53
values | jur_abb
stringclasses 53
values | question_context
stringclasses 48
values | question
stringlengths 65
516
| answer
stringlengths 0
1.62k
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
500 | 2-4 | 0 | uses_benefit_ratio_formula | bool | Texas | TX | BENEFIT-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-ratio formula (benefits charged divided by employer’s payroll) also uses benefits as the measure of experience, but eliminates contributions from the formula and relates benefits directly to payrolls. The theory is that if each employer pays a rate that approximates their benefit-ratio, the program will be adequately financed. Rates are further varied by the inclusion in the formulas of schedules (effective at specified levels of the state fund in terms of dollar amounts), proportion of payrolls, or fund adequacy percentage. Unlike the reserve-ratio, the benefit-ratio system is geared to short-term experience. The following table shows the number of years used for each state in determining benefit-ratios. | Does the state of Texas use the benefit-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | True |
501 | 2-4 | 0 | uses_benefit_ratio_formula | bool | Utah | UT | BENEFIT-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-ratio formula (benefits charged divided by employer’s payroll) also uses benefits as the measure of experience, but eliminates contributions from the formula and relates benefits directly to payrolls. The theory is that if each employer pays a rate that approximates their benefit-ratio, the program will be adequately financed. Rates are further varied by the inclusion in the formulas of schedules (effective at specified levels of the state fund in terms of dollar amounts), proportion of payrolls, or fund adequacy percentage. Unlike the reserve-ratio, the benefit-ratio system is geared to short-term experience. The following table shows the number of years used for each state in determining benefit-ratios. | Does the state of Utah use the benefit-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | True |
502 | 2-4 | 0 | uses_benefit_ratio_formula | bool | Virginia | VA | BENEFIT-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-ratio formula (benefits charged divided by employer’s payroll) also uses benefits as the measure of experience, but eliminates contributions from the formula and relates benefits directly to payrolls. The theory is that if each employer pays a rate that approximates their benefit-ratio, the program will be adequately financed. Rates are further varied by the inclusion in the formulas of schedules (effective at specified levels of the state fund in terms of dollar amounts), proportion of payrolls, or fund adequacy percentage. Unlike the reserve-ratio, the benefit-ratio system is geared to short-term experience. The following table shows the number of years used for each state in determining benefit-ratios. | Does the state of Virginia use the benefit-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | True |
503 | 2-4 | 0 | uses_benefit_ratio_formula | bool | US Virgin Islands | VI | BENEFIT-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-ratio formula (benefits charged divided by employer’s payroll) also uses benefits as the measure of experience, but eliminates contributions from the formula and relates benefits directly to payrolls. The theory is that if each employer pays a rate that approximates their benefit-ratio, the program will be adequately financed. Rates are further varied by the inclusion in the formulas of schedules (effective at specified levels of the state fund in terms of dollar amounts), proportion of payrolls, or fund adequacy percentage. Unlike the reserve-ratio, the benefit-ratio system is geared to short-term experience. The following table shows the number of years used for each state in determining benefit-ratios. | Does the state of US Virgin Islands use the benefit-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
504 | 2-4 | 0 | uses_benefit_ratio_formula | bool | Vermont | VT | BENEFIT-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-ratio formula (benefits charged divided by employer’s payroll) also uses benefits as the measure of experience, but eliminates contributions from the formula and relates benefits directly to payrolls. The theory is that if each employer pays a rate that approximates their benefit-ratio, the program will be adequately financed. Rates are further varied by the inclusion in the formulas of schedules (effective at specified levels of the state fund in terms of dollar amounts), proportion of payrolls, or fund adequacy percentage. Unlike the reserve-ratio, the benefit-ratio system is geared to short-term experience. The following table shows the number of years used for each state in determining benefit-ratios. | Does the state of Vermont use the benefit-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | True |
505 | 2-4 | 0 | uses_benefit_ratio_formula | bool | Washington | WA | BENEFIT-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-ratio formula (benefits charged divided by employer’s payroll) also uses benefits as the measure of experience, but eliminates contributions from the formula and relates benefits directly to payrolls. The theory is that if each employer pays a rate that approximates their benefit-ratio, the program will be adequately financed. Rates are further varied by the inclusion in the formulas of schedules (effective at specified levels of the state fund in terms of dollar amounts), proportion of payrolls, or fund adequacy percentage. Unlike the reserve-ratio, the benefit-ratio system is geared to short-term experience. The following table shows the number of years used for each state in determining benefit-ratios. | Does the state of Washington use the benefit-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | True |
506 | 2-4 | 0 | uses_benefit_ratio_formula | bool | Wisconsin | WI | BENEFIT-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-ratio formula (benefits charged divided by employer’s payroll) also uses benefits as the measure of experience, but eliminates contributions from the formula and relates benefits directly to payrolls. The theory is that if each employer pays a rate that approximates their benefit-ratio, the program will be adequately financed. Rates are further varied by the inclusion in the formulas of schedules (effective at specified levels of the state fund in terms of dollar amounts), proportion of payrolls, or fund adequacy percentage. Unlike the reserve-ratio, the benefit-ratio system is geared to short-term experience. The following table shows the number of years used for each state in determining benefit-ratios. | Does the state of Wisconsin use the benefit-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
507 | 2-4 | 0 | uses_benefit_ratio_formula | bool | West Virginia | WV | BENEFIT-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-ratio formula (benefits charged divided by employer’s payroll) also uses benefits as the measure of experience, but eliminates contributions from the formula and relates benefits directly to payrolls. The theory is that if each employer pays a rate that approximates their benefit-ratio, the program will be adequately financed. Rates are further varied by the inclusion in the formulas of schedules (effective at specified levels of the state fund in terms of dollar amounts), proportion of payrolls, or fund adequacy percentage. Unlike the reserve-ratio, the benefit-ratio system is geared to short-term experience. The following table shows the number of years used for each state in determining benefit-ratios. | Does the state of West Virginia use the benefit-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
508 | 2-4 | 0 | uses_benefit_ratio_formula | bool | Wyoming | WY | BENEFIT-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-ratio formula (benefits charged divided by employer’s payroll) also uses benefits as the measure of experience, but eliminates contributions from the formula and relates benefits directly to payrolls. The theory is that if each employer pays a rate that approximates their benefit-ratio, the program will be adequately financed. Rates are further varied by the inclusion in the formulas of schedules (effective at specified levels of the state fund in terms of dollar amounts), proportion of payrolls, or fund adequacy percentage. Unlike the reserve-ratio, the benefit-ratio system is geared to short-term experience. The following table shows the number of years used for each state in determining benefit-ratios. | Does the state of Wyoming use the benefit-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | True |
509 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Alaska | AK | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Alaska use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
510 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Alabama | AL | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Alabama use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
511 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Arkansas | AR | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Arkansas use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
512 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Arizona | AZ | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Arizona use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
513 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | California | CA | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of California use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
514 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Colorado | CO | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Colorado use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
515 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Connecticut | CT | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Connecticut use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
516 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | District of Columbia | DC | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of District of Columbia use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
517 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Delaware | DE | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Delaware use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | True |
518 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Florida | FL | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Florida use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
519 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Georgia | GA | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Georgia use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
520 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Hawaii | HI | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Hawaii use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
521 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Iowa | IA | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Iowa use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
522 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Idaho | ID | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Idaho use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
523 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Illinois | IL | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Illinois use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
524 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Indiana | IN | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Indiana use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
525 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Kansas | KS | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Kansas use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
526 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Kentucky | KY | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Kentucky use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
527 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Louisiana | LA | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Louisiana use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
528 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Massachusetts | MA | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Massachusetts use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
529 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Maryland | MD | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Maryland use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
530 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Maine | ME | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Maine use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
531 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Michigan | MI | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Michigan use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
532 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Minnesota | MN | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Minnesota use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
533 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Missouri | MO | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Missouri use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
534 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Mississippi | MS | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Mississippi use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
535 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Montana | MT | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Montana use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
536 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | North Carolina | NC | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of North Carolina use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
537 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | North Dakota | ND | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of North Dakota use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
538 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Nebraska | NE | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Nebraska use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
539 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | New Hampshire | NH | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of New Hampshire use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
540 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | New Jersey | NJ | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of New Jersey use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
541 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | New Mexico | NM | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of New Mexico use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
542 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Nevada | NV | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Nevada use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
543 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | New York | NY | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of New York use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
544 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Ohio | OH | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Ohio use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
545 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Oklahoma | OK | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Oklahoma use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | True |
546 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Oregon | OR | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Oregon use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
547 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Pennsylvania | PA | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Pennsylvania use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
548 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Puerto Rico | PR | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Puerto Rico use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
549 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Rhode Island | RI | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Rhode Island use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
550 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | South Carolina | SC | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of South Carolina use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
551 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | South Dakota | SD | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of South Dakota use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
552 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Tennessee | TN | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Tennessee use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
553 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Texas | TX | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Texas use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
554 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Utah | UT | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Utah use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
555 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Virginia | VA | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Virginia use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
556 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | US Virgin Islands | VI | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of US Virgin Islands use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
557 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Vermont | VT | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Vermont use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
558 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Washington | WA | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Washington use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
559 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Wisconsin | WI | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Wisconsin use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
560 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | West Virginia | WV | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of West Virginia use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
561 | 2-5 | 0 | uses_benefit_wage_ratio_formula | bool | Wyoming | WY | BENEFIT-WAGE-RATIO FORMULA—The benefit-wage-ratio formula is significantly different from the other formulas. It makes no attempt to measure all benefits paid to the workers of individual employers. The relative experience of employers is measured by the separations of workers which result in benefit payments, but the duration of their benefits is not a factor. The separations, weighted with the wages earned by the workers with each base period employer, are recorded on each employer’s experience rating record as “benefit wages.” Only one separation per beneficiary per benefit year is recorded for any one employer. The index which is used to establish the relative experience of employers is the proportion of each employer’s payroll which is paid to those workers who become unemployed and receive benefits (i.e., the ratio of an employer’s benefit wages to total taxable wages). The ratio of total benefit payments and total benefit wages, known as the state experience factor, means that, on average, the workers who drew benefits received a certain amount of benefits for each dollar of benefit wages paid and the same amount of taxes per dollar of benefit wages is needed to replenish the fund. The total amount to be raised is distributed among employers in accordance with their benefit-wage-ratios; the higher the ratio, the higher the rate.
Individual employer rates are determined by multiplying the employer’s experience factor by the state experience factor. The multiplication is facilitated by a table, which assigns rates that are the same as, or slightly more than, the product of the employer’s benefit-wage-ratio and the state factor. | Does the state of Wyoming use the benefit-wage-ratio formula as their experience rating formula? | False |
562 | 2-6 | 0 | employer_specified | str | Rhode Island | RI | CHARGING METHODS Another consideration for state experience rating provisions is how a state allocates benefit charges across a worker’s employment history. States use various methods to identify the employer(s) who will be held liable for benefits paid (i.e., charged) when a worker becomes unemployed and receives benefits. In the reserve- ratio and benefit-ratio states, it is the worker’s benefit payments that are charged; in the benefit-wage-ratio states, the benefit wages. There is no charging of benefits in states using the payroll variation plan. In most states, the maximum amount of benefits to be charged for a claim is the maximum amount for which a worker is eligible under the state law (see Table 3-11, Maximum Benefit Entitlement). In states with benefit-wage-ratio formulas, the maximum amount of benefit wages charged is usually the amount of wages required for maximum annual benefits. CHARGING MOST RECENT OR PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER—Some states charge the most recent employer (i.e., last employer) or the employer with the largest proportion of base period wages (i.e., principal employer) on the theory that this employer is responsible for the unemployment, if that unemployment is involuntary on the part of the worker. The following table shows states that charge the most recent employer or the principal employer. As noted, some states will not charge an employer if only casual or short time employment is involved. | Does the state of Rhode Island charge the _most recent or principal employer_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | Most recent BP employer |
563 | 2-6 | 0 | employer_specified | str | Virginia | VA | CHARGING METHODS Another consideration for state experience rating provisions is how a state allocates benefit charges across a worker’s employment history. States use various methods to identify the employer(s) who will be held liable for benefits paid (i.e., charged) when a worker becomes unemployed and receives benefits. In the reserve- ratio and benefit-ratio states, it is the worker’s benefit payments that are charged; in the benefit-wage-ratio states, the benefit wages. There is no charging of benefits in states using the payroll variation plan. In most states, the maximum amount of benefits to be charged for a claim is the maximum amount for which a worker is eligible under the state law (see Table 3-11, Maximum Benefit Entitlement). In states with benefit-wage-ratio formulas, the maximum amount of benefit wages charged is usually the amount of wages required for maximum annual benefits. CHARGING MOST RECENT OR PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER—Some states charge the most recent employer (i.e., last employer) or the employer with the largest proportion of base period wages (i.e., principal employer) on the theory that this employer is responsible for the unemployment, if that unemployment is involuntary on the part of the worker. The following table shows states that charge the most recent employer or the principal employer. As noted, some states will not charge an employer if only casual or short time employment is involved. | Does the state of Virginia charge the _most recent or principal employer_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | Most recent employer; charges omitted for employers who employed individual less than 30 days or 240 hours |
564 | 2-6 | 0 | employer_specified | str | South Carolina | SC | CHARGING METHODS Another consideration for state experience rating provisions is how a state allocates benefit charges across a worker’s employment history. States use various methods to identify the employer(s) who will be held liable for benefits paid (i.e., charged) when a worker becomes unemployed and receives benefits. In the reserve- ratio and benefit-ratio states, it is the worker’s benefit payments that are charged; in the benefit-wage-ratio states, the benefit wages. There is no charging of benefits in states using the payroll variation plan. In most states, the maximum amount of benefits to be charged for a claim is the maximum amount for which a worker is eligible under the state law (see Table 3-11, Maximum Benefit Entitlement). In states with benefit-wage-ratio formulas, the maximum amount of benefit wages charged is usually the amount of wages required for maximum annual benefits. CHARGING MOST RECENT OR PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER—Some states charge the most recent employer (i.e., last employer) or the employer with the largest proportion of base period wages (i.e., principal employer) on the theory that this employer is responsible for the unemployment, if that unemployment is involuntary on the part of the worker. The following table shows states that charge the most recent employer or the principal employer. As noted, some states will not charge an employer if only casual or short time employment is involved. | Does the state of South Carolina charge the _most recent or principal employer_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | Most recent employer; charges omitted for employers who employed individual less than 8 x WBA |
565 | 2-6 | 0 | employer_specified | str | Georgia | GA | CHARGING METHODS Another consideration for state experience rating provisions is how a state allocates benefit charges across a worker’s employment history. States use various methods to identify the employer(s) who will be held liable for benefits paid (i.e., charged) when a worker becomes unemployed and receives benefits. In the reserve- ratio and benefit-ratio states, it is the worker’s benefit payments that are charged; in the benefit-wage-ratio states, the benefit wages. There is no charging of benefits in states using the payroll variation plan. In most states, the maximum amount of benefits to be charged for a claim is the maximum amount for which a worker is eligible under the state law (see Table 3-11, Maximum Benefit Entitlement). In states with benefit-wage-ratio formulas, the maximum amount of benefit wages charged is usually the amount of wages required for maximum annual benefits. CHARGING MOST RECENT OR PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER—Some states charge the most recent employer (i.e., last employer) or the employer with the largest proportion of base period wages (i.e., principal employer) on the theory that this employer is responsible for the unemployment, if that unemployment is involuntary on the part of the worker. The following table shows states that charge the most recent employer or the principal employer. As noted, some states will not charge an employer if only casual or short time employment is involved. | Does the state of Georgia charge the _most recent or principal employer_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | Most recent employer |
566 | 2-6 | 0 | employer_specified | str | Idaho | ID | CHARGING METHODS Another consideration for state experience rating provisions is how a state allocates benefit charges across a worker’s employment history. States use various methods to identify the employer(s) who will be held liable for benefits paid (i.e., charged) when a worker becomes unemployed and receives benefits. In the reserve- ratio and benefit-ratio states, it is the worker’s benefit payments that are charged; in the benefit-wage-ratio states, the benefit wages. There is no charging of benefits in states using the payroll variation plan. In most states, the maximum amount of benefits to be charged for a claim is the maximum amount for which a worker is eligible under the state law (see Table 3-11, Maximum Benefit Entitlement). In states with benefit-wage-ratio formulas, the maximum amount of benefit wages charged is usually the amount of wages required for maximum annual benefits. CHARGING MOST RECENT OR PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER—Some states charge the most recent employer (i.e., last employer) or the employer with the largest proportion of base period wages (i.e., principal employer) on the theory that this employer is responsible for the unemployment, if that unemployment is involuntary on the part of the worker. The following table shows states that charge the most recent employer or the principal employer. As noted, some states will not charge an employer if only casual or short time employment is involved. | Does the state of Idaho charge the _most recent or principal employer_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | Employer who paid largest amount of BPW |
567 | 2-6 | 0 | employer_specified | str | Illinois | IL | CHARGING METHODS Another consideration for state experience rating provisions is how a state allocates benefit charges across a worker’s employment history. States use various methods to identify the employer(s) who will be held liable for benefits paid (i.e., charged) when a worker becomes unemployed and receives benefits. In the reserve- ratio and benefit-ratio states, it is the worker’s benefit payments that are charged; in the benefit-wage-ratio states, the benefit wages. There is no charging of benefits in states using the payroll variation plan. In most states, the maximum amount of benefits to be charged for a claim is the maximum amount for which a worker is eligible under the state law (see Table 3-11, Maximum Benefit Entitlement). In states with benefit-wage-ratio formulas, the maximum amount of benefit wages charged is usually the amount of wages required for maximum annual benefits. CHARGING MOST RECENT OR PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER—Some states charge the most recent employer (i.e., last employer) or the employer with the largest proportion of base period wages (i.e., principal employer) on the theory that this employer is responsible for the unemployment, if that unemployment is involuntary on the part of the worker. The following table shows states that charge the most recent employer or the principal employer. As noted, some states will not charge an employer if only casual or short time employment is involved. | Does the state of Illinois charge the _most recent or principal employer_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | Most recent employer; charges omitted for employers who employed individual less than 30 days, except if the earnings from the employer allow the individual to requalify following a disqualification |
568 | 2-6 | 0 | employer_specified | str | Kentucky | KY | CHARGING METHODS Another consideration for state experience rating provisions is how a state allocates benefit charges across a worker’s employment history. States use various methods to identify the employer(s) who will be held liable for benefits paid (i.e., charged) when a worker becomes unemployed and receives benefits. In the reserve- ratio and benefit-ratio states, it is the worker’s benefit payments that are charged; in the benefit-wage-ratio states, the benefit wages. There is no charging of benefits in states using the payroll variation plan. In most states, the maximum amount of benefits to be charged for a claim is the maximum amount for which a worker is eligible under the state law (see Table 3-11, Maximum Benefit Entitlement). In states with benefit-wage-ratio formulas, the maximum amount of benefit wages charged is usually the amount of wages required for maximum annual benefits. CHARGING MOST RECENT OR PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER—Some states charge the most recent employer (i.e., last employer) or the employer with the largest proportion of base period wages (i.e., principal employer) on the theory that this employer is responsible for the unemployment, if that unemployment is involuntary on the part of the worker. The following table shows states that charge the most recent employer or the principal employer. As noted, some states will not charge an employer if only casual or short time employment is involved. | Does the state of Kentucky charge the _most recent or principal employer_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | Most recent employer; charges omitted for employers who employed individual less than 10 weeks |
569 | 2-6 | 0 | employer_specified | str | Maine | ME | CHARGING METHODS Another consideration for state experience rating provisions is how a state allocates benefit charges across a worker’s employment history. States use various methods to identify the employer(s) who will be held liable for benefits paid (i.e., charged) when a worker becomes unemployed and receives benefits. In the reserve- ratio and benefit-ratio states, it is the worker’s benefit payments that are charged; in the benefit-wage-ratio states, the benefit wages. There is no charging of benefits in states using the payroll variation plan. In most states, the maximum amount of benefits to be charged for a claim is the maximum amount for which a worker is eligible under the state law (see Table 3-11, Maximum Benefit Entitlement). In states with benefit-wage-ratio formulas, the maximum amount of benefit wages charged is usually the amount of wages required for maximum annual benefits. CHARGING MOST RECENT OR PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER—Some states charge the most recent employer (i.e., last employer) or the employer with the largest proportion of base period wages (i.e., principal employer) on the theory that this employer is responsible for the unemployment, if that unemployment is involuntary on the part of the worker. The following table shows states that charge the most recent employer or the principal employer. As noted, some states will not charge an employer if only casual or short time employment is involved. | Does the state of Maine charge the _most recent or principal employer_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | Most recent employer for more than 5 consecutive weeks; charges omitted for employers for whom individual worked 5 consecutive weeks or less |
570 | 2-6 | 0 | employer_specified | str | Michigan | MI | CHARGING METHODS Another consideration for state experience rating provisions is how a state allocates benefit charges across a worker’s employment history. States use various methods to identify the employer(s) who will be held liable for benefits paid (i.e., charged) when a worker becomes unemployed and receives benefits. In the reserve- ratio and benefit-ratio states, it is the worker’s benefit payments that are charged; in the benefit-wage-ratio states, the benefit wages. There is no charging of benefits in states using the payroll variation plan. In most states, the maximum amount of benefits to be charged for a claim is the maximum amount for which a worker is eligible under the state law (see Table 3-11, Maximum Benefit Entitlement). In states with benefit-wage-ratio formulas, the maximum amount of benefit wages charged is usually the amount of wages required for maximum annual benefits. CHARGING MOST RECENT OR PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER—Some states charge the most recent employer (i.e., last employer) or the employer with the largest proportion of base period wages (i.e., principal employer) on the theory that this employer is responsible for the unemployment, if that unemployment is involuntary on the part of the worker. The following table shows states that charge the most recent employer or the principal employer. As noted, some states will not charge an employer if only casual or short time employment is involved. | Does the state of Michigan charge the _most recent or principal employer_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | Most recent employer charged for first 2 weeks of benefits; Thereafter, BP employers charged proportionately (with respect to wages) |
571 | 2-6 | 0 | employer_specified | str | Nevada | NV | CHARGING METHODS Another consideration for state experience rating provisions is how a state allocates benefit charges across a worker’s employment history. States use various methods to identify the employer(s) who will be held liable for benefits paid (i.e., charged) when a worker becomes unemployed and receives benefits. In the reserve- ratio and benefit-ratio states, it is the worker’s benefit payments that are charged; in the benefit-wage-ratio states, the benefit wages. There is no charging of benefits in states using the payroll variation plan. In most states, the maximum amount of benefits to be charged for a claim is the maximum amount for which a worker is eligible under the state law (see Table 3-11, Maximum Benefit Entitlement). In states with benefit-wage-ratio formulas, the maximum amount of benefit wages charged is usually the amount of wages required for maximum annual benefits. CHARGING MOST RECENT OR PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER—Some states charge the most recent employer (i.e., last employer) or the employer with the largest proportion of base period wages (i.e., principal employer) on the theory that this employer is responsible for the unemployment, if that unemployment is involuntary on the part of the worker. The following table shows states that charge the most recent employer or the principal employer. As noted, some states will not charge an employer if only casual or short time employment is involved. | Does the state of Nevada charge the _most recent or principal employer_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | Employer who paid 75% of an individual's BPW, except if a reimbursing employer is liable |
572 | 2-6 | 0 | employer_specified | str | New Hampshire | NH | CHARGING METHODS Another consideration for state experience rating provisions is how a state allocates benefit charges across a worker’s employment history. States use various methods to identify the employer(s) who will be held liable for benefits paid (i.e., charged) when a worker becomes unemployed and receives benefits. In the reserve- ratio and benefit-ratio states, it is the worker’s benefit payments that are charged; in the benefit-wage-ratio states, the benefit wages. There is no charging of benefits in states using the payroll variation plan. In most states, the maximum amount of benefits to be charged for a claim is the maximum amount for which a worker is eligible under the state law (see Table 3-11, Maximum Benefit Entitlement). In states with benefit-wage-ratio formulas, the maximum amount of benefit wages charged is usually the amount of wages required for maximum annual benefits. CHARGING MOST RECENT OR PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER—Some states charge the most recent employer (i.e., last employer) or the employer with the largest proportion of base period wages (i.e., principal employer) on the theory that this employer is responsible for the unemployment, if that unemployment is involuntary on the part of the worker. The following table shows states that charge the most recent employer or the principal employer. As noted, some states will not charge an employer if only casual or short time employment is involved. | Does the state of New Hampshire charge the _most recent or principal employer_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | Most recent employer; charges omitted for employers who paid individual less than 12 consecutive weeks; benefits paid following disqualifications for voluntary quit, discharge for misconduct, and refusal of suitable work will be charged to the employer's account who furnished the employment |
573 | 2-6 | 0 | employer_specified | str | New York | NY | CHARGING METHODS Another consideration for state experience rating provisions is how a state allocates benefit charges across a worker’s employment history. States use various methods to identify the employer(s) who will be held liable for benefits paid (i.e., charged) when a worker becomes unemployed and receives benefits. In the reserve- ratio and benefit-ratio states, it is the worker’s benefit payments that are charged; in the benefit-wage-ratio states, the benefit wages. There is no charging of benefits in states using the payroll variation plan. In most states, the maximum amount of benefits to be charged for a claim is the maximum amount for which a worker is eligible under the state law (see Table 3-11, Maximum Benefit Entitlement). In states with benefit-wage-ratio formulas, the maximum amount of benefit wages charged is usually the amount of wages required for maximum annual benefits. CHARGING MOST RECENT OR PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER—Some states charge the most recent employer (i.e., last employer) or the employer with the largest proportion of base period wages (i.e., principal employer) on the theory that this employer is responsible for the unemployment, if that unemployment is involuntary on the part of the worker. The following table shows states that charge the most recent employer or the principal employer. As noted, some states will not charge an employer if only casual or short time employment is involved. | Does the state of New York charge the _most recent or principal employer_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | Most recent employer charged 7 x individual's WBA; thereafter, BP employers charged proportionately (with respect to wages) |
574 | 2-6 | 0 | employer_specified | str | Puerto Rico | PR | CHARGING METHODS Another consideration for state experience rating provisions is how a state allocates benefit charges across a worker’s employment history. States use various methods to identify the employer(s) who will be held liable for benefits paid (i.e., charged) when a worker becomes unemployed and receives benefits. In the reserve- ratio and benefit-ratio states, it is the worker’s benefit payments that are charged; in the benefit-wage-ratio states, the benefit wages. There is no charging of benefits in states using the payroll variation plan. In most states, the maximum amount of benefits to be charged for a claim is the maximum amount for which a worker is eligible under the state law (see Table 3-11, Maximum Benefit Entitlement). In states with benefit-wage-ratio formulas, the maximum amount of benefit wages charged is usually the amount of wages required for maximum annual benefits. CHARGING MOST RECENT OR PRINCIPAL EMPLOYER—Some states charge the most recent employer (i.e., last employer) or the employer with the largest proportion of base period wages (i.e., principal employer) on the theory that this employer is responsible for the unemployment, if that unemployment is involuntary on the part of the worker. The following table shows states that charge the most recent employer or the principal employer. As noted, some states will not charge an employer if only casual or short time employment is involved. | Does the state of Puerto Rico charge the _most recent or principal employer_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | Most recent employer charged 50% of benefits paid and the remaining 50% charged proportionately to all BP employers |
575 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Alaska | AK | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Alaska charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
576 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Alabama | AL | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Alabama charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
577 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Arkansas | AR | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Arkansas charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
578 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Arizona | AZ | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Arizona charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
579 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | California | CA | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of California charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
580 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Colorado | CO | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Colorado charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | True |
581 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Connecticut | CT | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Connecticut charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
582 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | District of Columbia | DC | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of District of Columbia charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
583 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Delaware | DE | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Delaware charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
584 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Florida | FL | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Florida charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
585 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Georgia | GA | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Georgia charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
586 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Hawaii | HI | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Hawaii charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
587 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Iowa | IA | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Iowa charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | True |
588 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Idaho | ID | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Idaho charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
589 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Illinois | IL | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Illinois charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
590 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Indiana | IN | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Indiana charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
591 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Kansas | KS | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Kansas charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
592 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Kentucky | KY | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Kentucky charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
593 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Louisiana | LA | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Louisiana charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
594 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Massachusetts | MA | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Massachusetts charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | True |
595 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Maryland | MD | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Maryland charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
596 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Maine | ME | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Maine charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
597 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Michigan | MI | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Michigan charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
598 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Minnesota | MN | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Minnesota charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
599 | 2-7 | 0 | charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order | bool | Missouri | MO | CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers. | Does the state of Missouri charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed? | False |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.