Datasets:

idx
int64
0
3.7k
table_id
stringclasses
48 values
column_num
int64
0
7
column_name
stringclasses
94 values
column_dtype
stringclasses
3 values
jurisdiction
stringclasses
53 values
jur_abb
stringclasses
53 values
question_context
stringclasses
48 values
question
stringlengths
65
516
answer
stringlengths
0
1.62k
600
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Mississippi
MS
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Mississippi charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
601
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Montana
MT
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Montana charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
602
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
North Carolina
NC
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of North Carolina charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
603
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
North Dakota
ND
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of North Dakota charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
604
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Nebraska
NE
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Nebraska charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
605
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
New Hampshire
NH
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of New Hampshire charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
606
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
New Jersey
NJ
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of New Jersey charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
607
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
New Mexico
NM
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of New Mexico charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
608
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Nevada
NV
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Nevada charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
609
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
New York
NY
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of New York charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
610
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Ohio
OH
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Ohio charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
611
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Oklahoma
OK
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Oklahoma charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
612
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Oregon
OR
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Oregon charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
613
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Pennsylvania
PA
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Pennsylvania charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
614
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Puerto Rico
PR
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Puerto Rico charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
615
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Rhode Island
RI
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Rhode Island charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
616
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
South Carolina
SC
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of South Carolina charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
617
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
South Dakota
SD
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of South Dakota charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
618
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Tennessee
TN
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Tennessee charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
619
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Texas
TX
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Texas charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
620
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Utah
UT
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Utah charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
621
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Virginia
VA
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Virginia charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
622
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
US Virgin Islands
VI
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of US Virgin Islands charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
623
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Vermont
VT
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Vermont charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
624
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Washington
WA
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Washington charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
625
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Wisconsin
WI
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Wisconsin charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
626
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
West Virginia
WV
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of West Virginia charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
627
2-7
0
charges_base_period_employers_in_inverse_chronological_order
bool
Wyoming
WY
CHARGING BASE-PERIOD EMPLOYERS IN INVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER—Some states limit charges to base-period employers but charge them in inverse order of employment. This method combines the theory of charging the most recent employer and the theory that charges should bear some relation to the amount of wages earned by the worker. Responsibility for the unemployment of a claimant is assumed to lessen with time. A maximum limit is placed on the amount that may be charged any one employer; when the limit is reached, the next previous employer is charged. The limit is usually fixed as a fraction of the wages paid by the employer or as a specified amount in the base period or in the quarter, or as a combination of the two. Usually, the limit is the same as the limit on the duration of benefits in terms of quarterly or base-period wages. If a worker’s period of unemployment is short, or if the last employer in the base period employed the individual for a considerable part of the base period, charging employers in inverse chronological order gives the same results as charging the last employer in the base period. If a worker’s period of unemployment is long, such charging gives much the same results as charging all base-period employers proportionately. All the states that provide for charging in inverse order of employment have determined, by regulation, the order of charging in case of simultaneous employment by two or more employers.
Does the state of Wyoming charge the _base-period employers in inverse chronological order_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
False
628
2-8
0
details
str
Hawaii
HI
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Hawaii charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
629
2-8
0
details
str
Indiana
IN
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Indiana charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
Law also provides for charges to BP employers in inverse order
630
2-8
0
details
str
Kansas
KS
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Kansas charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
631
2-8
0
details
str
Louisiana
LA
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Louisiana charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
632
2-8
0
details
str
Maryland
MD
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Maryland charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
Principal employer will be charged for shut-downs for convenience; employers participating in shared work will bear all charges
633
2-8
0
details
str
Minnesota
MN
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Minnesota charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
634
2-8
0
details
str
Mississippi
MS
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Mississippi charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
635
2-8
0
details
str
Missouri
MO
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Missouri charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
Charges omitted for employers who employed individual less than 28 days or paid individual less than $400
636
2-8
0
details
str
Montana
MT
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Montana charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
637
2-8
0
details
str
New Jersey
NJ
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of New Jersey charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
638
2-8
0
details
str
New Mexico
NM
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of New Mexico charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
639
2-8
0
details
str
North Carolina
NC
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of North Carolina charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
Amount charged to a BP employer's account is the benefit allocated to such employer multiplied by 120%
640
2-8
0
details
str
North Dakota
ND
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of North Dakota charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
641
2-8
0
details
str
Ohio
OH
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Ohio charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
642
2-8
0
details
str
Oklahoma
OK
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Oklahoma charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
If employer recalls a laid-off or separated employee and the employee continues to be employed, or voluntarily terminates employment or is discharged for misconduct within the BY, benefit charges may be reduced by the ratio of remaining weeks of eligibility to the total weeks of entitlement
643
2-8
0
details
str
Oregon
OR
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Oregon charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
644
2-8
0
details
str
Pennsylvania
PA
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Pennsylvania charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
645
2-8
0
details
str
Tennessee
TN
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Tennessee charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
646
2-8
0
details
str
Texas
TX
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Texas charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
647
2-8
0
details
str
Utah
UT
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Utah charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
648
2-8
0
details
str
Vermont
VT
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Vermont charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
649
2-8
0
details
str
US Virgin Islands
VI
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of US Virgin Islands charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
650
2-8
0
details
str
Washington
WA
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Washington charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
Charged to separating employer for certain quits with good cause
651
2-8
0
details
str
West Virginia
WV
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of West Virginia charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
652
2-8
0
details
str
Wisconsin
WI
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Wisconsin charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
Benefits are not charged to an employer constituting less than 5% of an individual's BPW
653
2-8
0
details
str
Wyoming
WY
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Wyoming charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
True
654
2-8
0
details
str
Alabama
AL
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Alabama charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
X
655
2-8
0
details
str
Arizona
AZ
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Arizona charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
X
656
2-8
0
details
str
Arkansas
AR
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Arkansas charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
X
657
2-8
0
details
str
California
CA
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of California charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
X
658
2-8
0
details
str
Connecticut
CT
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Connecticut charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
Charges omitted for employers who paid individual less than $500
659
2-8
0
details
str
Delaware
DE
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Delaware charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
X
660
2-8
0
details
str
District of Columbia
DC
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of District of Columbia charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
X
661
2-8
0
details
str
Florida
FL
CHARGING IN PROPORTION TO BASE-PERIOD WAGES—On the theory that unemployment results from general conditions of the labor market more than from a given employer’s separations, the largest number of states charge benefits against all base-period employers in proportion to the wages earned by the worker with each employer. Their charging methods assume that liability for benefits is inherent in the wage payments creating the worker’s eligibility. (Note that states combining this method with charging the most recent employer are listed in Table 2-6, States that Charge Most Recent or Principal Employer.)
Does the state of Florida charge the _all employers in proportion to base-period wages_ for benefits paid when a worker becomes unemployed?
Charges omitted for employers who paid worker less than $100
662
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Alaska
AK
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Alaska allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
663
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Alabama
AL
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Alabama allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
664
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Arkansas
AR
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Arkansas allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
665
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Arizona
AZ
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Arizona allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
666
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
California
CA
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of California allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
667
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Colorado
CO
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Colorado allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
668
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Connecticut
CT
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Connecticut allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
669
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
District of Columbia
DC
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of District of Columbia allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
670
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Delaware
DE
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Delaware allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
671
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Florida
FL
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Florida allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
672
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Georgia
GA
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Georgia allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
673
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Hawaii
HI
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Hawaii allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
674
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Iowa
IA
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Iowa allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
675
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Idaho
ID
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Idaho allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
676
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Illinois
IL
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Illinois allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
677
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Indiana
IN
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Indiana allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
678
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Kansas
KS
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Kansas allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
679
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Kentucky
KY
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Kentucky allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
680
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Louisiana
LA
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Louisiana allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
681
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Massachusetts
MA
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Massachusetts allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
682
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Maryland
MD
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Maryland allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
683
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Maine
ME
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Maine allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
684
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Michigan
MI
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Michigan allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
685
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Minnesota
MN
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Minnesota allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
686
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Missouri
MO
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Missouri allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
687
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Mississippi
MS
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Mississippi allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
688
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Montana
MT
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Montana allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
689
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
North Carolina
NC
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of North Carolina allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
690
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
North Dakota
ND
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of North Dakota allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
691
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Nebraska
NE
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Nebraska allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
692
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
New Hampshire
NH
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of New Hampshire allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
693
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
New Jersey
NJ
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of New Jersey allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
694
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
New Mexico
NM
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of New Mexico allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
695
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Nevada
NV
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Nevada allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
696
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
New York
NY
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of New York allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
697
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Ohio
OH
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Ohio allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
True
698
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Oklahoma
OK
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Oklahoma allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False
699
2-13
0
permits_rate_reduction_through_voluntary_contributions
bool
Oregon
OR
RATE REDUCTION THROUGH VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS—About half of the states provide for employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions. Federal law requires that voluntary contributions be made earlier than 120 days after the beginning of the rate year, though some states establish earlier due dates. Since federal law restricts refunds to only erroneous payments, if a voluntary contribution does not lead to a reduced rate or if an employer later changes their mind, no refund can be made. In reserve-ratio states (refer to Table 2-3, Reserve-Ratio Formula States), a voluntary contribution increases the balance in the employer’s reserve, resulting in a lower rate being assigned that will save more than the amount of the voluntary contribution. In benefit-ratio states (refer to Table 2-4, Benefit-Ratio Formula States), an employer pays voluntary contributions to cancel benefit charges to its account, thereby reducing its benefit-ratio.
Does the state of Oregon allow employers to obtain lower rates by making voluntary contributions?
False